qzeebrella (
qzeebrella) wrote2010-06-28 01:05 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
okay, I have a possibly weird question for any of my flist who would like to chime in with an opinion. I especially would like to hear from the Americans on my list about the below question, but it would also be very interesting to hear what the flisters from other places besides the US think of it to. So here goes, with some background first...
in 1995 "Quebec voted on whether to separate from Canada" and become it's own sovereign nation. It was huge news here in Canada and there is still an active Separist movement, though it doesn't seem to be moving for another plebicite in the near future. The question that occured to me was:
"Okay, so there are a lot of Mormons (Latter Day Saints) in Utah and a lot of their beliefs are unique to their faith, if they all got together and started pushing for the Utah senate to hold a referendum on whether or not to separate from the U.S.A. and become their own independent nation, what would happen?"
So? Opinions? Thoughts? Is it even theoretically possible for one of the states within the United States to separate? A very curious and sometimes odd Canadian wants to know.
in 1995 "Quebec voted on whether to separate from Canada" and become it's own sovereign nation. It was huge news here in Canada and there is still an active Separist movement, though it doesn't seem to be moving for another plebicite in the near future. The question that occured to me was:
"Okay, so there are a lot of Mormons (Latter Day Saints) in Utah and a lot of their beliefs are unique to their faith, if they all got together and started pushing for the Utah senate to hold a referendum on whether or not to separate from the U.S.A. and become their own independent nation, what would happen?"
So? Opinions? Thoughts? Is it even theoretically possible for one of the states within the United States to separate? A very curious and sometimes odd Canadian wants to know.
no subject
no subject
no subject
See: our Civil War.
Technically, a state has the right to secede. However, the Federal government looks down on it, to the point of forcibly keeping a state in the union. Yet another dissolution of Constitutional powers alloted to the states via the Tenth Amendment. See also US Federalism.
On an interesting note, both Texas and Hawaii were sovereign countries when they jointed the US. (The 13 states preceding the ratification of the Constitution were also independent bodies, but that was different.) They could theoretically get away with leaving with a lot less, um, violence? (as if). Texas makes noises now and then (well, Texans make noises; their legislature is more and more diluted into Federal government-dependent wimps -- not that there's anything wrong with that. Technically.).
no subject
That said, it's good to know what's technically allowed, even when it's known that doing what's technically allowed would be frowned upon.
no subject
I have seen groups calling for a National Constitution Amendment which would allow for a state to secede, if there was a certain vote by the state populace and the state had to assume a portion of the National debt, give automatic leases for any military bases within the state, etc. Pretty complicated procedure, but in theory, it could work. If it ever passed and was added to the US Constitution.
Would beat another war. Do I think we could end up in another war? Always possible. I'd like to think we wouldn't, but.
My 2 cents.
no subject
then again, some of our comedians say we did have a civil war and that it happened in a bar in Ontario somewhere, involved a dozen people and one casualty...
or that we had one and that it didn't survive Louis Riel's hanging.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject